Board Thread:Nominations/@comment-5585298-20130506190127/@comment-4347542-20130516131824

77.69.2.220 wrote: I'm not like him get the adimn. him is childish and no experiance and small spam no problem. -5 admimn Please, if you are going to support or reject a proposed admin, please do so with correct spelling and syntax; unless English is not your primary language then I retract the earlier statement. I'm assuming that you mean that spam is not an issue and therefore we should not appoint him based on a specific issue, however he has other parts of his application that should be considered too. Also, please provide a support for your arguement, beyond "him is childish and no experiance" you provide no support for your arguement, yet you give him a "-5" when the standard convention is to use "+/-1".