Board Thread:Command Center/@comment-5585298-20140426193631/@comment-5585298-20140427123159

Cheese, I agree, there are far too many admins. No offence to those guys, but when I saw their applications, I thought "No, more admins are not needed." When I became one, the only Admins were the bureaucrats. All of these guys are now inactive. Since then, we have had three more admins come aboard. I saw their applications (again, no offence guys), and everyone was voting yes, yes, yes, without really giving any reason as to why they were saying yes. When I was elected, people considered my time zone, and how that would benefit catching spammers.

This is a quote from Namj13 on my nomination page:

"I'm working on the personalized questions so that the community can better judge the applicant before the vote. Wikia staff appointment is a democratic process, we have the requirements to screen out unqualified applicants, but after that, the community chooses who they wish to represent them."

Unfortunately, the "Special:ContactUser" function that Namj used to ask those questions no longer seems to work.

Also, I've noticed, on applicant's applications, they seem to say the generic stuff: "I've never been banned... I will respect my powers..." etc., but have given hardly any reason, and prior experience. Experience is very important. I said that I'd graduated from a Leadership Academy based here in Scotland. That's experience.

Anyway, that was a tangent. My point is that the people choosing need to realise if more Admins are needed or not.