Board Thread:Command Center/@comment-5585298-20140426193631/@comment-24317446-20140427004657

Muzic Beaner wrote: 1) But it can be improved

2) Ofcourse it does, however Cheese's statements seem more stated as in ABSOLUTE reather than on opinion, thats why remind him it IS AN OPINION ONLY.

3)Partly true, bias can creep into practicaly everywhere. However don't you think that the general wiki population holding that admin accountable for his acctions and statements on a daily basis will deter biasism? 1.) Yes, it could be improved. Remove voting completely.

2.) It's quite clear that the administration is unorganized and the votes are inefficient. People are voting with no real reasoning behind their decisions and there are ten Administrators, most of which are inactive. They are unable to communicate adequately because of their large numbers and different timezones. It's much better to have a small, efficient, and thorough administration, because a good administration will equal a good wiki.

3.) The general wiki population doesn't need to hold an Administrator responsible for his actions, because it's clear they don't know how. The community already proved that they have no idea when Administrators are doing something wrong, thanks to the unfortunate event where I and my friends were blocked for doing nothing. What did the community do about this? They all said "HOORAH, YEAH! THE DEVILISH FIENDS ARE ALL BLOCKED!" when all we were doing were formally debating on a thread. Other Administrators and Bureaucrats should hold an Administrator responsible for his actions, which is what occurred in this event, which resulted in my unblocking, along with my freinds' unblockings.