Board Thread:Command Center/@comment-5585298-20140426193631/@comment-10427184-20140427014903

Gigantic text in 3...2...1...

Music, I understand that you were definitely trying to calm the situation. Thank you for that. But...I feel that some of your points are invalid.

1. You say you still stand for voting. But why? You didn't give us a reason. As you can see here, we gave a big explanation for everything we supported. You did give your reasons for wanting a vote, but they are kind of proved false, given ours.

2. My posts WEREN'T opinions. They were taken from many threads in the past. You also said that we need someone unbiased and mature. And how do we do this? Not by voting, definitely. As I said, we don't know what everyone is thinking. Voting makes the wiki all the more biased and inefficient.

3. No offense to the admins, but they were rather inefficient in running the wiki before the IB wiki came along. I mean, debating isn't a reason to ban us, and neither is "being annoying". It has been proved that communication was inefficient as well; 8100STAR was sort-of neutral, ShadowMan was leaning towards Specter and King, Specter was trying to ban us, and Niveli was hating at us with the fury of the sun. It's been quite obvious. This is my opinion, you may say, but these were true. These were the actual facts and ban reasons. 4. Mugen's posts were very true, because it is obvious. Something obvious is well, generally accepted by everyone. The community also doesn't seem to know what a wiki is (a wiki is equal) and the admins thought they were "at the controls". They aren't, and there's clearly a huge amount of bias here. Not that there is a lot of it, now, but this could happen if we were to vote.

Again, these are facts. Go check any Wikia guideline, and they'll tell you the do's and don'ts.