Board Thread:Nominations/@comment-24146651-20150911134422

8100DSTAR wrote: A note to all.

I've noticed that a lot of you lately have been posting nominations for administrative privileges.

We all appreciate your enthusiasm. However, when posting, really think.
 * "What can I do to improve the Wiki?"
 * "Am I needed as an admin right now?"
 * "Will I be dedicated enough?"

Further explanations include
 * Why do you want to be a staff?
 * What prior experience do you have?
 * What on the Wiki needs to be improved?

Remember, we already have 10 admins.

This also goes for the voters. I realise when one votes -1, it can seem insulting or rude, and therefore you feel obliged to vote in favour. Just remember, the vote is there for a reason. If there was no voting system, then people would become admins left right and centre.

So remember, the next time you think about nominating yourself, anyone else, or vote for anyone, take into account these points. This was a post 8100DSTAR made a while ago, and I just wanted to recap on a few things.

1. Admin positions being open may change at any time.

2. You must follow all expectations as described in the Admin Nomination Policy.

3. Please be nice to people who are trying to apply.

Other than that, feel free to nominate if you can follow all requirements.

 ~NiveliKing~ 13:44, September 11, 2015 (UTC) 