Board Thread:Command Center/@comment-5585298-20140426193631/@comment-24317446-20140427152533

Slayingthehalcyon wrote:

8100DSTAR wrote:

Slayingthehalcyon wrote: Well in this case, I think that this is the error of the people in charge. If you already have enough admins, DON'T let anymore on. You have a point here. However, a certain user requested bureaucrat status, when they had only recently become a n admin. Everyone was saying yes, and +1ing, but I said no, becuase of how inexperienced the user was. As soon as that user got one "no", they thought I was "bombarding" them, as if I had spite. I had no spite whatsoever. The user was obviously not experienced enough to become a BC, and was a little immature when they got a "no". (No offence to that user).

This shows that the people were blindly voting yes, but I saw it from a different perspective. However, that matter is over, but my point is how quick the users were to say yes rather than stop and think. Sadly that happens, and I've seen quite a few users voted in because of stupidity and retarded users voting....

That's why believe in a users with rights should vote in Bureaucrats... Admins/alreadytherebcrats, should have the communities favor, so their decisions should reflect the communities best interest.

Another good point, is that when you vote, ALWAYS give a reason for your vote, whether it's a + or a - or even a on the fence comment. I tend to like to give at least three sentences with my vote. sometimes I'll even give more.

c: Wait, so you're saying that users with special rights should form a "council" of sorts to investigate and vote in a candidate?