Board Thread:Command Center/@comment-5585298-20140426193631/@comment-24317446-20140427003337

Muzic Beaner wrote:

1. I clearly stated its a HALF AND HALF situation.. the first half is what the Bureaucrats and Admin perceive and evaluate on the candidate and the other half is what the general population thinks.

2. All this is just YOUR PERSONAL OPINION and does not in fact reflect the true state and operation of the wiki.

 3. And it IS necessary because an admin that relies on the opinion of the general population WON'T TAKE SIDES IN A DISCUSSION OR SHOULD AN INSSUE ARISE LIKE ITS BEEN CLEARLY SEEN BEFORE..

1. Hence partly inefficient. Why don't the Admins and Bureaucrats make 100% of the decision? I mean, were they not voted in by the community in the first place? Or does the community not trust its own administration to make decisions themselves?

2. I thought the opinion of the community mattered...? I also agree that the wiki is very unorganized with all of these democratic values.

3. It's not guaranteed that an Admin relies on the opinion of the general population. You CANNOT stop someone from putting bias into a statement or idea, it's human nature. Yes, Admins and Bureaus could rely on the opinion of the general population, but they could rely on their opinion through thought-out descriptive suggestions on how to better the wiki, not mindless and blatant votes with no real reasoning.